The Obama
administration has announced a proposal to open up coastal waters from Virginia
to Georgia for oil and
gas drilling. Opening the Eastern Seaboard to oil companies is a prize the
industry has sought for decades and is a blow to environmental groups. They
argue that the move would put the coasts of Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia
at risk for an environmental disaster like the BP spill that struck the Gulf
Coast in 2010. According to Bob Deans, a spokesman for the Natural Resources
Defense Council, “Opening Atlantic waters to offshore drilling would take us in
exactly the wrong direction. It would ignore the lessons of the disastrous BP
blowout, the need to protect future generations from the dangers of climate
change and the promise of a clean-energy future" (Davenport, 2015). The
part of the Atlantic Ocean that is being considered for oil drilling is an
ecologically diverse network of soft-bottom shelves and rocky canyons that
includes some of most dynamic and mysterious marine systems on Earth. Many of
the species living in this part of the ocean have sensitive acoustic systems
such as the endangered Fin and Right whales.
The
potential to drill in the Atlantic Ocean is related to our course Principles of
Ecology because it has a potential to affect the many interconnected parts of
the ocean's system. The ocean has many species, some known and many unknown.
These species play an important role in creating and maintaining their habitat.
Their habitat depends on them and they depend on their habitat. once accident
such as an oil spill could put these species in serious harm. According to
Steve Ross, a research professor at UNC-Wilmington, in a spill, every part of
the ecosystem is potentially at risk—the bottom, the upper water column, the
surface, and the shore. There are not a lot of places where you could say, 'We
could afford to write that off.' (Welch, 2015)
I
believe it's important to realize the consequences of drilling in the Atlantic
ocean. We risk having another incident the like BP oil spill, which took a lot
of money and effort to clean up the Gulf and species that lived in it. It's
also important to recognize that the result of the BP oil spill has not been
completely rectified, so it is a consequence that has long lasting effects. Obtaining
human resources such as oil is imperative, but protecting our environment
should be a priority. If Obama fights against the Keystone Pipeline because of
the harmful effects it could have on the environment, than he should fight
against drilling in the Atlantic Ocean.
Work Cited
Davenport, C. (2015, January 26). White House to
Propose Allowing Oil Drilling Off Atlantic Coast. Retrieved from
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/us/politics/white-house-to-propose-allowing-oil-drilling-off-atlantic-coast.html?_r=0
Welch, C. (2015, January
29). Could Drilling in the Atlantic Harm Fish, Whales, Turtles? Retrieved from
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/01/150129-ocean-atlantic-offshore-drilling-oil-environment-animals/
I agree with you, it would be very hypocritical of President Obama to reject the Keystone Pipeline and then propose drilling in these areas. The areas of the coast of Virginia contain even more wildlife than the areas around the prosed Keystone Pipeline. By agreeing to one plan and rejecting another Obama would be claiming that ocean ecosystems are not as important and do not deserve to be protected . This is wrong however because every ecosystem should be conserved not matter its location. Since our world is so interconnected and so many ecosystems rely on one another, President Obama should aim to protect all areas.
ReplyDeleteOpening coastal waters for oil and gas drilling can be really dangerous for the environmental. The ocean contains an ecosystems with a large diversity, and also, has a lot of animals that we even don't know that exist. If any problems occurs, the effects can be drastic, and take years and a great amount of money to be reconstructed.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Berkeley here. If President Obama wishes to make a stand against climate change and human interference with the environment, he should do so in a way that does not introduce hypocrisy into his decisions, therefor he should put an end to this.
ReplyDelete